Prioritizing the Right Over the Good: Analyzing Moral and Ethical Implications

Introduction The dichotomy between the concepts of “the right” and “the good” in moral philosophy presents a fundamental challenge in ethical discourse. The primary aim of this paper is to explore the implications of prioritizing “the right”—actions that are morally permissible or obligatory—over “the good,” which encompasses outcomes that contribute to overall well-being and happiness. This analysis will delve into various ethical frameworks, particularly deontological ethics, which emphasize duties and rules, and consequentialism, which focuses on the outcomes of actions. Through this examination, the paper will elucidate the complexities involved in prioritizing moral duties over beneficial outcomes, ultimately arguing that while there are merits to both perspectives, prioritizing the right can lead to a more just society, albeit with certain caveats.

Theoretical Foundations: Understanding “The Right” and “The Good” To frame the discussion, it is essential to define “the right” and “the good.” In moral philosophy, “the right” refers to actions that align with moral principles or duties, irrespective of their consequences. This notion is prominently f